Page 1 of 1
Signal Failures -SOLVED- 15/07/2013 at 18:50 #47188 | |
GW43125
![]() 495 posts |
Why is it I only ever seem to get signal failures a signal or two ahead of the signal the train is at, causing the previous signal to revert to danger and the driver suffer a brown-trouser moment and report an ACOA. Is there any way I can select the random failures to happen away from the trains or is it just bad luck? Would appreciate some help here Thanks in advance Last edited: 16/07/2013 at 15:04 by GW43125 Log in to reply |
Signal Failures 15/07/2013 at 18:55 #47190 | |
Peter Bennet
![]() 5437 posts |
Bad luck. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
Signal Failures 15/07/2013 at 18:55 #47191 | |
Steamer
![]() 4034 posts |
You can't stop random failures dropping signals in front of trains (although you do seem to be having a lot of bad luck!). You can turn off random failures and set your own signal failure by selecting the signal via the F11 Incident Control Panel and unticking the 'Lamp proving' box if you want though. EDIT: Peter posted while I was typing. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Last edited: 15/07/2013 at 18:56 by Steamer Log in to reply |
Signal Failures 16/07/2013 at 09:35 #47210 | |
kbarber
![]() 1779 posts |
That's a bit unusual though; in my experience the vast majority of failures would occur as something changed state (a lamp failed as the aspect changed, which would almost always be behind a train, or a track staying down as the train proceeded).
Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Signalhunter |
Signal Failures 16/07/2013 at 09:38 #47211 | |
ralphjwchadkirk
![]() 275 posts |
Agreed with the above. To be realistic, surely failures should be weighted towards where something changes - TCF occupation, change of signal aspect etc, whilst still retaining an element of randomness.
Log in to reply |
Signal Failures 16/07/2013 at 14:33 #47224 | |
clive
![]() 2823 posts |
" said:Agreed with the above. To be realistic, surely failures should be weighted towards where something changes - TCF occupation, change of signal aspect etc, whilst still retaining an element of randomness.They are. Log in to reply |
Signal Failures 16/07/2013 at 14:59 #47227 | |
GW43125
![]() 495 posts |
Actually, the signal failures and point failures do normally happen just as i set the route and my TCF's do generally happen when it doesn't clear behind a train, though not always the case Thanks Log in to reply |