Etymology of railway terminology

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > Open mic (non-railway) > Etymology of railway terminology

Page 1 of 2

Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 09:57 #159415
Anothersignalman
Avatar
114 posts
Flabberdacks suggested branching from my other thread to discuss the comparative etymology of various railway terms worldwide, e.g. the use of the term 'dock', and from my perspective, whether the Victorian Railways were the only place to use "double compound" in lieu of "double slip" (same for singles), and "delta" in lieu of "scissors" crossovers?
Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 12:44 #159417
kbarber
Avatar
1764 posts
I have an idea the GWR used 'compound' for slip points. But then the GW was always a law unto themselves. Never come across 'delta'.

South of the Border, dock was - as others have said - usually a siding (most often a short one) where loading/unloading would take place.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 13:14 #159419
TUT
Avatar
545 posts
kbarber in post 159417 said:
I have an idea the GWR used 'compound' for slip points. But then the GW was always a law unto themselves. Never come across 'delta'.
I think so as well. Remember, there are two ways of doing things. There's the Great Western way and the wrong way.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 15:43 #159421
clive
Avatar
2799 posts
Anothersignalman in post 159415 said:
whether the Victorian Railways were the only place to use "double compound" in lieu of "double slip" (same for singles), and "delta" in lieu of "scissors" crossovers?
I've come across "compound points" meaning points interlaced with a diamond crossing; in other words, what's more normally known as "slips". With, of course, "single compound" and "double compound". From the context, I've got the impression that these were the formal names for the constructs, with "slip" being a colloquialism used by those down on the tracks.

To me, "delta" indicates three lines meeting with three or six points so that trains from any direction can head out in either of the other two directions.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 16:36 #159422
flabberdacks
Avatar
649 posts
Even just comparing Sydney and Melbourne terminology is a head-spin.

Possession / Occupation
4-car set / 4-car unit
Set the route / Pull the route (Set for a train / Pull for a train)
Block the points / Sleeve the points

Etc etc could go on for ages. I think Melbourne's more 'lever frame' language is a cultural thing from having large lever frames running the whole network until late in the piece, going almost straight from big levers to the computers at Metrol in 83 with only a very short power signalling era in between, and a further long time taken to get rid of the rest of the levers from the suburban area. By 1983 in Sydney there were NX panels running the CBD, Strathfield area and Campbelltown, Broadmeadow was commissioned that year I think, but power signalling had been around for decades even then, with prettymuch everything from Auburn to Penrith getting power frames with rotary or toggle switches instead of levers in the late 50s. (This is an extreme generalisation just to outline my point).

So it may have been that fewer and fewer Sydney signallers were 'pulling' or 'sleeving' anything which caused the lingo to change over the years.

Use of the term 'dock' in Victoria to describe the act of bringing a train into service from a siding is something I've not heard nor read an equivalent of anywhere else. I like it. But I suspect the lack of a train description arrangement until, what was it, the 1970s? meant that the train that came to your platform to form the 0648 up was your "6:48 dock" and it just stayed that way down the generations. Even now, having had a train describer for 50 years, plenty of people insist on that terminology rather than trying to find '3504' on a timetable or graph.

Also when it comes to running Flinders Street, the signallers, inner area train controllers and the fleet controllers all have the timetable represented to them in time order, so it's much easier to refer to a train as "the 7:51 Ringwood arrival" rather than its train describer number. Much quicker to find.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 19:42 #159426
GeoffM
Avatar
6380 posts
(From other thread)

Ron_J in post 159409 said:
flabberdacks in post 159402 said:
Anothersignalman in post 159396 said:
Shunt and redock procedure.
Although everyone has understood what you meant, it's interesting to note (in my experience) that this is a specifically Victorian description of the move. There is no equivalent term for a 'dock' in Sydney, and I've not heard any of our British friends describe bringing a train from siding to platform in that way either. It may have come around as a consequence of Melbourne's failure to use any sort of train description system until quite late in the semaphore era.

Just an interesting note about how truly independent the development of Melbourne and Sydney railways were. The language used is totally different, for identical concepts. Victorian electric signalling systems used one switch or lever for all routes from a signal where NSW (usually) had one switch or lever per route.

Irrelevant to the post, sorry! As you were, gentlemen
Oddly enough in Scotland we refer to ‘docking’ when talking about platforming and we often call platforms ‘docks’. That doesn’t seem to be the case anywhere else in the UK.
The original IECC ARS referred to signalling a train into an occupied platform without joining as "double docking", though I guess it's quite possible a Scotsman was on the dev team. These days (or at least when I last worked on it) "platform sharing" was the preferred term.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 20:28 #159430
Anothersignalman
Avatar
114 posts
flabberdacks in post 159422 said:
I think Melbourne's more 'lever frame' language is a cultural thing from having large lever frames running the whole network until late in the piece, going almost straight from big levers to the computers at Metrol in 83 with only a very short power signalling era in between, and a further long time taken to get rid of the rest of the levers from the suburban area.
Not quite, we still have Frankston, Kooyong, Riversdale and Sandringham, for a net 142 levers (subtract gaps, spares, and the five on the end of Sandringham that were never installed), plus the ten levers still at Ouyen. Those are all tappet machines, our last cam and soldier machine was removed a few months ago from South Geelong (20) and is now in storage for future redeployment at Daylesford, joining probably 300 levers in preservation (public and private).

Last edited: 12/12/2024 at 20:30 by Anothersignalman
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 20:30 #159431
Anothersignalman
Avatar
114 posts
clive in post 159421 said:
To me, "delta" indicates three lines meeting with three or six points so that trains from any direction can head out in either of the other two directions.
My hypothesis is that the term derives from the small solid triangle of metal that you get on one side of a scissors crossover, forming two V-noses, when the diamond is offset rather than centred between the through lines. If that's true, then the term delta can only apply to such offset arrangements, and would not work for a centred-diamond arrangement.

Last edited: 12/12/2024 at 20:31 by Anothersignalman
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 21:14 #159435
Splodge
Avatar
721 posts
Sheffield Platform 2C is referred to as the Dock (I think its route indication may be D as opposed to a number as well)
There's the right way, the wrong way and the railway.
Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 12/12/2024 at 21:34 #159436
Steamer
Avatar
3997 posts
Splodge in post 159435 said:
Sheffield Platform 2C is referred to as the Dock (I think its route indication may be D as opposed to a number as well)
When Sheffield PSB first opened, the points to access it were released from a ground frame and access was only via S89 signal. So it certainly did spend some of its life as a dock, I don't know what it was pre-PSB.

"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 09:22 #159443
Joe S
Avatar
131 posts
I don't have the sim (yet), but something I always wondered: on Central Coast there are a few 'decant' sidings.

To me, coming from the UK, the only thing you'd ever decant is wine... is it emptying toilet waste or unloading goods or something totally different in Aussie terminology?

Cheers,
Joe

Last edited: 13/12/2024 at 09:22 by Joe S
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 09:28 #159444
jc92
Avatar
3701 posts
Steamer in post 159436 said:
Splodge in post 159435 said:
Sheffield Platform 2C is referred to as the Dock (I think its route indication may be D as opposed to a number as well)
When Sheffield PSB first opened, the points to access it were released from a ground frame and access was only via S89 signal. So it certainly did spend some of its life as a dock, I don't know what it was pre-PSB.
It was always a parcels dock historically until it was resignalled as 2C.

D makes sense as you can't have 2 on the indicator. It's the same as a lot of placing still showing B for bay.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 10:43 #159446
flabberdacks
Avatar
649 posts
Anothersignalman in post 159430 said:
Not quite,
(this is why I said it was a generalisation, I know exactly what the suburban network has got, as is required by my job, just didn't want to bog everything down in details)

:)

Joe S in post 159443 said:
'decant' sidings
Yes, it's emptying toilet waste. A very literal interpretation of decant meaning 'pouring from one container to another'!

Many trains will decant before stabling for the night on Central Coast.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Joe S
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 13:48 #159450
kbarber
Avatar
1764 posts
Well, as we seem to be expanding from track formations, where do we start?

Some associated with Absolute Block working (and, as they're colloquialisms, rarely used as exactly as I'm giving them):
Get the call: be offered a train by the box in rear
Peg up: give Line Clear when accepting a train
Peg over: turn the commutator to Train On Line
Drop the needle: turn the commutator to Normal
Knock in (or Bang in): send the Is Line Clear signal without first calling attention
Knock out: send Train Out of Section without calling attention (neither of which ever happened, of course... :-) )
References to pegging relate to the pegging instrument (the one that transmits indications to the rear box) and have their origin in the form of the earliest instruments. These were modified single-needle telegraph instruments and the commutator was held over from the Normal position by inserting a peg into a hole drilled through the commutator shaft and its housing, a method quickly supplanted by any number of different designs of catches.

Empty coaching stock had a number of colloquial abbreviations. On the LNWR they were 'stocks' while Great Northern men called them 'coaches'. On the Midland (including the LTS) and the Great Eastern they were 'empty cars', usually abbreviated to 'cars', reflecting US influences on those lines.

'Pull off' for the action of clearing a signal (or calling a route) was still very much in use, even in NX panel boxes, as late as the 1990s; I don't know whether it persisted into IECCs or whether it's still in use (though my suspicion is that most likely it very much is).

We still talk of 'collaring' levers, switches or buttons with reminder appliances rather than blocking or sleeving. Whether that terminology has persisted into workstation installations I don't know.

Memory insists that the GE and the LTS didn't bother with 'set' or 'unit'; we just referred to, eg, 'a four car' or 'a two by four'. Sometimes even 'car' was dropped, so you might get "the 31 Enfield's running as a four" or somesuch. 'Set' might be used when referring to a loco-hauled train.

Signals might be Boards or Pegs (the latter on the MR, for certain) or Sticks (but that was definitely Underground usage). Origins in wooden boards explain the former, the other two are of less certain origin. A distant would be a Back Board or Back'un. Shunt signals were dummies, dods or dollies; again I've no idea of the origins. The latter was potentially treacherous, as the subsidiary posts on a bracket or gantry were dolls (and I suspect that might have been an official term).

'Bobby', for signalman, had its origins in the origin of the grade in the original railway policemen of the 1840s. Likewise the equivalent 'Officer', which seems to have been limited to the GWR.

Enough for the moment. This could become a very long thread!

Last edited: 13/12/2024 at 13:50 by kbarber
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 14:47 #159452
TUT
Avatar
545 posts
kbarber in post 159450 said:
'Pull off' for the action of clearing a signal (or calling a route) was still very much in use, even in NX panel boxes, as late as the 1990s; I don't know whether it persisted into IECCs or whether it's still in use (though my suspicion is that most likely it very much is).
Definitely. ARS even pulls off.

The origins of 'on' and 'off' being, I understand, the earlier kinds of board-type signals which would be turned physically on towards drivers such that the signal could be seen and then turned off in such a way that the signal would be facing away from trains and thus essentially invisible. A form of signalling lacking a positive clear indication and therefore not particularly fail safe.

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 15:45 #159453
kbarber
Avatar
1764 posts
TUT in post 159452 said:
kbarber in post 159450 said:
'Pull off' for the action of clearing a signal (or calling a route) was still very much in use, even in NX panel boxes, as late as the 1990s; I don't know whether it persisted into IECCs or whether it's still in use (though my suspicion is that most likely it very much is).
Definitely. ARS even pulls off.

Thanks for that.

TUT in post 159452 said:
The origins of 'on' and 'off' being, I understand, the earlier kinds of board-type signals which would be turned physically on towards drivers such that the signal could be seen and then turned off in such a way that the signal would be facing away from trains and thus essentially invisible. A form of signalling lacking a positive clear indication and therefore not particularly fail safe.

I think that etymology might be even earlier. I think the first boards (and the miniature braziers that were used for night time indications!) were literally taken off of the post to give a clear signal! And I have seen, somewhere, a (semaphore days) reference to signals being 'taken off'.

Old terminology could remain in use well beyond when it would make sense. For instance I have a copy of instructions for Acceptance Lever working in the Colchester area (1961-ish, signalled with all colour lights) that refers to when a signalman may 'lower' a signal!

Drifting to the edges of the topic, the act of turning a board certainly makes sense of French terminology, that speaks of 'opening' and 'closing' signals.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: TUT
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 16:08 #159456
Steamer
Avatar
3997 posts
flabberdacks in post 159446 said:


Joe S in post 159443 said:
'decant' sidings
Yes, it's emptying toilet waste. A very literal interpretation of decant meaning 'pouring from one container to another'!

Many trains will decant before stabling for the night on Central Coast.
Traditionally a 'flushing apron' in the UK back when the contents was dropped onto the track. Now 'CET Road' (Controlled Emissions Tank, I think???) or similar.

"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 16:32 #159457
Tempest Malice
Avatar
123 posts
TUT in post 159452 said:
kbarber in post 159450 said:
'Pull off' for the action of clearing a signal (or calling a route) was still very much in use, even in NX panel boxes, as late as the 1990s; I don't know whether it persisted into IECCs or whether it's still in use (though my suspicion is that most likely it very much is).
Definitely. ARS even pulls off.
Though of course you do need to be careful that since NX panel days (though the word is used this way round with computer control system too) whilst "pulling off" very much means clearing a signal, just "pulling" a route means putting the signal back to danger given that is the result for literally pulling on the button on an NX panel.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: TUT
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 16:44 #159460
TUT
Avatar
545 posts
kbarber in post 159453 said:
TUT in post 159452 said:
The origins of 'on' and 'off' being, I understand, the earlier kinds of board-type signals which would be turned physically on towards drivers such that the signal could be seen and then turned off in such a way that the signal would be facing away from trains and thus essentially invisible. A form of signalling lacking a positive clear indication and therefore not particularly fail safe.

I think that etymology might be even earlier. I think the first boards (and the miniature braziers that were used for night time indications!) were literally taken off of the post to give a clear signal! And I have seen, somewhere, a (semaphore days) reference to signals being 'taken off'.

Old terminology could remain in use well beyond when it would make sense. For instance I have a copy of instructions for Acceptance Lever working in the Colchester area (1961-ish, signalled with all colour lights) that refers to when a signalman may 'lower' a signal!

Drifting to the edges of the topic, the act of turning a board certainly makes sense of French terminology, that speaks of 'opening' and 'closing' signals.
I've heard and used 'take off' but generally 'pull off' would be preferred.

Absolutely I was thinking of mentioning myself that not only can upper quadrant signals be lowered but so can colour lights. Although not quite as recent as your references to the term, it struck me that the LNER's yellow peril titled 'High Barnet: Bringing Into Use New Signal Box and Installation of Colour Light Signalling' includes an instruction beginning 'In the event of a signal which is not applicable to the normal route of his train being lowered [...]' Although mind you I suppose they did have electro-pneumatic, externally illuminated disc shunting signals.

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 13/12/2024 at 16:48 #159461
TUT
Avatar
545 posts
Of course it can go the other way. Drivers used to MAS have a very disobliging habit of calling my ground discs "ground position lights/signals".

I do not approve of this, but one doesn't tend to say anything.

Speaking of position lights, one to add to the list would be 'cat's eyes' for position-light subsidiary signals in colour-light areas.

Last edited: 13/12/2024 at 16:50 by TUT
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 14/12/2024 at 02:07 #159474
flabberdacks
Avatar
649 posts
TUT in post 159461 said:


I do not approve of this, but one doesn't tend to say anything.
Would feel a little pedantic perhaps haha!

Just sigh and give them the road...

That's another interesting one, 'giving the road', and the act of returning a signal to stop/danger "I'll take signal x off you" or "I'll take the road off you there"

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 14/12/2024 at 09:42 #159476
kbarber
Avatar
1764 posts
TUT in post 159461 said:
<snip>
Speaking of position lights, one to add to the list would be 'cat's eyes' for position-light subsidiary signals in colour-light areas.
Plus, of course, 'feather' for a position light junction indicator.

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 16/12/2024 at 11:32 #159517
kbarber
Avatar
1764 posts
Another couple:
'Clear back' for giving TOS (etymology unknown but reasonably logical).
'Under the hammer' for accepting a train under the old Regulation 5 (am I right in thinking it's 3.5 in the modern regs?) The Midland Railway used a hammer head arm for subsidiary signals, which would include Warning signals where they were provided.

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 16/12/2024 at 12:03 #159518
flabberdacks
Avatar
649 posts
kbarber in post 159517 said:
Another couple:
'Clear back' for giving TOS (etymology unknown but reasonably logical).
'Under the hammer' for accepting a train under the old Regulation 5 (am I right in thinking it's 3.5 in the modern regs?) The Midland Railway used a hammer head arm for subsidiary signals, which would include Warning signals where they were provided.
What was reg 5, out of interest?

Log in to reply
Etymology of railway terminology 16/12/2024 at 13:58 #159519
TUT
Avatar
545 posts
flabberdacks in post 159518 said:
What was reg 5, out of interest?
It was the warning arrangement.

kbarber in post 159517 said:
Another couple:
'Clear back' for giving TOS (etymology unknown but reasonably logical).
'Under the hammer' for accepting a train under the old Regulation 5 (am I right in thinking it's 3.5 in the modern regs?) The Midland Railway used a hammer head arm for subsidiary signals, which would include Warning signals where they were provided.
Regulation 3.5 Restricted acceptance of Module TS3 Absolute block regulations, yes.

I'm tempted to add:

'Ready and on' for the Western practice of immediately transmitting train entering section upon a train which is close at hand being accepted. The 2 is acknowledged by the signalman in advance but the block left at line clear for long enough to give the other signalman time to clear his signals. So as to save a bit of walking.
'Knock for knock' I believe was a term sometimes used for grouping bells in such a way that if you were offered a train you'd just offer the next one at the same time.

But we are in danger of going on forever now

Log in to reply