Page 1 of 1
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 28/10/2018 at 12:49 #112908 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
Hereford SX 08 04 2015 This thread is for discussion of the Hereford SX 08 04 2015 timetable. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply The following user said thank you: hotwellian |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 04/11/2018 at 18:32 #113133 | |
hotwellian
211 posts |
I am enjoying playing this, but I note that several up freight trains routed into the up loop at Panteg are too long to fit
Last edited: 04/11/2018 at 18:33 by hotwellian Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 04/11/2018 at 18:34 #113134 | |
|
headshot119
4869 posts |
I'm sure the timetable writer will take a look when he gets back from Australia, however can you give us a clue on which trains are causing an issue? Incidentally I'm told that some trains have this problem in real life since some where extended in length. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply The following users said thank you: Meld, hotwellian |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 04/11/2018 at 23:15 #113138 | |
|
hotwellian
211 posts |
6A35 and 6V22 too long for Panteg up loop 6B94 and 6B85 too long for the down loop Log in to reply |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 05/11/2018 at 13:50 #113145 | |
|
Abraham
2 posts |
I am having a problem with the HST services coming into Hereford Platform 1 from Ledbury blocking access to Platform 2. !W00 is a case in point as the train sits in platform 1 for over an hour !
Log in to reply |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 06/11/2018 at 23:46 #113161 | |
|
headshot119
4869 posts |
Abraham in post 113145 said:I am having a problem with the HST services coming into Hereford Platform 1 from Ledbury blocking access to Platform 2. !W00 is a case in point as the train sits in platform 1 for over an hour !I've adjusted the stopping position in the sim so they stop hard up to the signal. It's tight in real life and they weren't quite stopping close enough if it was a 2+8. (Check for updates for the new version) "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply The following users said thank you: Meld, hotwellian |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 07/11/2018 at 14:13 #113170 | |
|
Abraham
2 posts |
Thanks for that.
Log in to reply The following user said thank you: headshot119 |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 07/11/2018 at 14:44 #113171 | |
postal
5263 posts |
As a temporary measure you can edit the TT to show Far End Exact for the stopping position rather then Default or you can instruct the train to shunt forward through F2.
“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 08/11/2018 at 11:32 #113180 | |
|
Phil-jmw
675 posts |
Due to my not paying enough attention to his TT, I pulled all off on the Down at Craven Arms for 3S71 instead of putting him in the loop as booked, and then cross him over to go back to Shrewsbury. I've just realised my error as he is approaching Hereford! Should he not have either:- a) queried the route when he was signalled main line at Craven Arms, or b) come to a stand behind CA21 Sig, instead of just keeping going? That said, I did see this happen once in real life when an engine in the process of running round a tank train on the Dn Goods at Derby North just kept going beyond St Marys and had to be stopped at Little Eaton Jn, with the bobby asking the dvr when he came on the SPT where he thought he was going! Regards, Phil. Last edited: 08/11/2018 at 11:33 by Phil-jmw Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 08/11/2018 at 11:39 #113181 | |
|
headshot119
4869 posts |
Phil-jmw in post 113180 said:Due to my not paying enough attention to his TT, I pulled all off on the Down at Craven Arms for 3S71 instead of putting him in the loop as booked, and then cross him over to go back to Shrewsbury. I've just realised my error as he is approaching Hereford! Should he not have either:-There's definitely an issue here. 1.0.7 has just landed on the updater to fix a few issues with paths to reversing locations. I've deliberately not included a fix for this issue for now, I need to have a think about what is the best thing to happen, and to get some opinions from the testing team on how that should be handled. Apologies that it's not fixed as quickly as I would normally like to but it's a bit of an edge case issue. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
| Hereford SX 08 04 2015 08/11/2018 at 11:56 #113186 | |
|
Phil-jmw
675 posts |
headshot119 in post 113181 said:Phil-jmw in post 113180 said:No worries Karl. Thanks for the v1.7 update which I'll download now, and pay a bit more attention to the TT.Due to my not paying enough attention to his TT, I pulled all off on the Down at Craven Arms for 3S71 instead of putting him in the loop as booked, and then cross him over to go back to Shrewsbury. I've just realised my error as he is approaching Hereford! Should he not have either:-There's definitely an issue here. 1.0.7 has just landed on the updater to fix a few issues with paths to reversing locations. Log in to reply |